Commit 5caf5e91 authored by Laura Kalbag's avatar Laura Kalbag
Browse files

New note

parent f7f5e4e9
title: 19 December 2018 07:55 UTC
date: 2018-12-19T07:55:46Z
tags: ["surveillance capitalism", "tracking", "profiling"]
categories: []
type: ["note", "latest"]
visibility: ["public"]
body_classes: "notes latest"
primary-bg: "3,100%,92%" # hsl(3,100%,92%)
secondary-bg: "5,100%,89%" # hsl(5,100%,89%)
text: "195,100%,20%" # hsl(195,100%,20%)
linktext: "195,100%,25%" # hsl(195,100%,25%)
darklinktext: "195,70%,14%" # hsl(195,70%,14%)
brilliant: "196,100%,42%" # hsl(196,100%,42%)
tab-two: "278,9%,83%" # hsl(278,9%,83%)
tab-three: "205,35%,76%" # hsl(205,35%,76%)
tab-four: "199,52%,67%" # hsl(199,52%,67%)
tab-five: "197,62%,59%" # hsl(197,62%,59%)
tab-six: "196,68%,51%" # hsl(196,68%,51%)
twitterurl: ""
mastodonurl: ""
instagramurl: ""
image: ""
imagealt: ""
description: ""
I don’t necessarily agree with the conclusion of [this article, ‘“Owning your data” will not save you from data capitalism’]( but I think it makes a few particularly useful points:
- “Owning” your own data can imply the ability/desire to sell it. It shouldn’t.
- It’s not just information about us as individuals that is valuable, the connective and meta data conveying our relationships to others is arguably more valuable.
- Plenty of data about us can be inferred without data specifically about us (see above.)
- Consent is impossible when you do not know how your data can be used against you.
Perhaps saying “owning and controlling your own data” (a phrase we use a lot at []( is misleading. We use it because, right now, corporations *do* own and control data about us, and so it makes sense that the inverse is that *we* (individuals) own and control that data. Maybe the emphasis should be on *control*. Maybe there are better words.
\ No newline at end of file
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment